an investigation to knowledge sharing amongst librarians in three electronic discussion groups (ala, alia & lis-iranian discussion list)

نویسندگان

محمد حسن زاده

mohammad hassanzadeh department of kis, tarbiat modares universityگروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس رقیه قربانی بوساری

roghayeh ghorbani busari tabriz university of medical scienceدانشکده داروسازی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان

چکیده

purpose: the current research aims to investigate the status of knowledge sharing amongst librarians in lis, ala and alia discussion groups. methodology: through purposive sampling, librarians from three discussion groups (ala, alia & lis-iranian discussion list) who announced their intention to participate in the research (460 people) were asked to complete the questionnaire between 2010/10/23 – 2011/ 05/22 this is a survey research and a type of applied research. data was collected from 400 questionnaires that were completed by respondents. findings: the results showed that participants from the three discussion groups have both active behavior and a positive attitude towards knowledge sharing. the lis librarians' knowledge has been evaluated as being lower than the knowledge of librarians on the other two mailing lists. according to the findings, there are meaningful differences between the knowledge, behavior and attitude of librarians towards knowledge sharing in the three discussion groups. in regard to inhibitors and motivators of knowledge sharing, the findings showed that, there were differences in the attitudes of librarians of the three groups in relation to the effective individual, organizational and technological knowledge sharing factors. in addition, there were meaningful differences between the attitudes of the lis, ala &alia; regarding the degree of influence of motivators and inhibitors on knowledge sharing. the greatest number of librarians from all the three groups used electronic methods for sharing knowledge, but the rate of their usage was different. overall, the status of knowledge sharing amongst librarians in alia and ala electronic discussion groups was considered to be better than that of librarians in lis. originality/value: this article is pioneer in the study of knowledge sharing on the basis of behavior, knowledge, and attitudes of librarians among ala, alia & lis-iranian discussion list.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

بررسی و مقایسۀ اشتراک دانش در میان کتابداران عضو گروه‌های بحث الکترونیکی علوم کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی ایران، آمریکا و استرالیا

Purpose: The current research aims to investigate the status of knowledge sharing amongst librarians in LIS, ALA and ALIA discussion groups. Methodology: Through purposive sampling, librarians from three discussion groups (ALA, ALIA & LIS-Iranian discussion list) who announced their intention to participate in the research  (460 people) were asked to complete the questionnaire between 2010/10/...

متن کامل

Anomaly Reconciliation in Electronic Discussion Groups

According to public goods theory, there should be a deficiency of knowledge shared in electronic discussion groups (EDG) because self-interested individuals would be motivated to receive others’ knowledge but not to share their own. A number of motivators (such as generalized reciprocity, altruism, and normative obligations) have been proposed to explain why people actually do share their knowl...

متن کامل

The anatomy of an electronic discussion list for librarians, KUTUP-L: Bibliometric and content analyses of postings

Electronic discussion lists are widely used as a professional and scientific communication tool since late 1980s. Analysis of messages sent to discussion lists provides useful information on professional as well as scientific communication patterns. In this paper, we present the findings of a bibliometric analysis of some 20,000 messages sent to KUTUP-L, an electronic discussion list for Turkis...

متن کامل

An Investigation of Gender Differences Between Women’s and Men’s Informal Discussion in Iranian EFL Context

The language used by women and men differ in all speech communities. In order to examine some of these variations, the present study aimed to investigate the differences in an informal written discourse. For this purpose, a comparison between men’s and women’s informal language was made regarding length of utterances, questions, intensifiers, and hedges. Results revealed that men employed highe...

متن کامل

Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups

Does collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups result in enhancing academic discourse and knowledge construction? This general research question has been researched in a study involving 300 students, working during six months in 38 electronic discussion groups. The transcripts of the discussions were coded and analysed to test hypotheses related to the impact on knowledge constru...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
تحقیقات اطلاع رسانی کتابخانه های عمومی

جلد ۲۰، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۲۷-۱۴۹

کلمات کلیدی

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023